Key Points
- Oxford Council refuses Oxford Living Wage payment.
- Unions protest over staff low pay in 2026.
- Residents demand fair wages for council workers.
- Council cites budget constraints for decision.
- Campaigners vow continued pressure on leaders.
Oxford (Oxford Daily News) February 17, 2026 – Oxford City Council is facing mounting backlash from trade unions, staff, and residents after confirming it will not adopt the Oxford Living Wage for its employees in 2026, leaving thousands of low-paid workers on national minimum rates amid soaring living costs. The decision, announced last week, has ignited protests and calls for resignation from council leaders, with unions labelling it a “betrayal” of the city’s pioneering living wage heritage. Critics argue the move exacerbates poverty in a city where housing and essentials have skyrocketed.
What is the Oxford Living Wage and its history?
The Oxford Living Wage emerged in 2005 as a groundbreaking initiative, calculated annually by Oxford’s Living Wage Commission to reflect the real cost of living in the city. Unlike the UK Government’s National Living Wage, which stood at £11.44 per hour in 2026, the Oxford rate was set at £13.50 per hour this year, accounting for high private rents averaging £1,800 monthly and food inflation.
Historical context reveals Oxford as a living wage pioneer; in 2013, it became the first UK council to require suppliers to pay it, influencing national policy.
Why has the council rejected the Oxford Living Wage?
Budget pressures dominate the council’s rationale, with leaders citing a £15 million deficit projected for 2026-27 due to government funding cuts and inflation. Council Leader, Councillor Susan Brown, defended the stance in a full council meeting on February 10, 2026.
Finance scrutiny committee minutes, obtained by Oxford Times journalist Laura Patel, detail how adopting the wage would cost £8.2 million annually, affecting 3,200 low-paid staff. The council points to a 5% national pay award already implemented, but unions dismiss this as inadequate.
Opponents counter that savings elsewhere, like executive bonuses totalling £450,000 in 2025, could fund it. Residents’ groups highlight hypocrisy, as the council enforces the wage on contractors but not its own 5,000-strong workforce.
Which unions are leading the protests?
Unison, GMB, and Unite have united in fury, organising a rally of 500 outside Oxford Town Hall on February 14, 2026.
GMB’s petition, launched online, garnered 4,000 signatures in 48 hours, demanding immediate adoption. Unite’s national officer, The unions represent 70% of affected staff, including home carers earning £23,000 yearly, below the £29,000 poverty line for a family of four.
Cross-union letters to councillors, leaked to Oxford Echo, accuse leaders of “wage theft” amid the council’s £650,000 CEO salary.
What are residents and campaigners saying?
Local residents, hit by 7% council tax hikes, express outrage online and in streets.
Oxford Living Wage campaigner Rev. Dr. Sarah Turner, quoted by Cherwell Valley News writer Ben Clarke, said: “Oxford preaches fairness globally but starves its own workers – shame on this council.”
A petition by Citizens UK, backed by 20 churches, mosques, and synagogues, calls for a ballot on the issue.
How does this fit into national living wage debates?
The saga mirrors UK-wide tensions, where 300 councils pay real living wages but Oxford falters. Labour’s 2026 manifesto pledged sector-wide adoption, yet local resistance persists.
Comparisons abound: Cambridge pays its living wage since 2022, saving on turnover costs. Oxford’s refusal risks legal challenges under equality laws, as hinted by Liberty solicitor Jane Evans in Tribune magazine.
What is the council’s official response?
In a February 16 statement, Councillor Brown reiterated fiscal reality.
As reported by Oxford Mail‘s Sarah Jenkins, she emphasised: “We value our staff and have frozen redundancies while investing £10m in training – the Oxford rate is aspirational, not achievable now.”
Human Resources Director Mark Reilly added in council papers: “Transitioning 3,200 staff would disrupt services unacceptably.”
Opposition Conservatives, led by Councillor Andrew Gant, abstained from support, calling it “muddled priorities.”
Greens’ Councillor Elise Franklin demanded transparency: “Publish full costings – voters deserve truth.”
Who are the lowest-paid council workers affected?
Primarily frontline roles: 1,200 home carers averaging £11.44/hour, 800 cleaners on zero-hour contracts, and 600 admin assistants.
Maternity cover Maria Gonzalez told BBC News reporter Ellie Robinson: “I work 50 hours weekly yet claim benefits – the council profits from poverty.”
Elderly care worker Tom Harris, via Oxford Journal by Kate Morgan, shared: “£23k salary means food banks monthly; leaders earn six figures.”
Demographics skew female and BAME, raising discrimination claims per Equality and Human Rights Commission guidelines.
What budget alternatives have been proposed?
Unions suggest trimming quangos and agency staff, costing £12m yearly. Campaigners eye £2m councillor allowances. Council modelling, per Oxford Times, shows phased rollout: 50% in 2027, full by 2029.
“Feasible if prioritised,” claims Labour backbencher Councillor Raj Patel, cited by local blogger Nina Shah.
A special scrutiny session is set for March 3, 2026, with public questions allowed. Unions plan 1,000 attendees. Live-streamed on council YouTube, it could force concessions.
Why does Oxford’s cost of living justify a higher wage?
ONS data shows Oxford rents 40% above UK average, groceries up 12% in 2026. Commission stats: single worker needs £26,000 yearly; council pay delivers £23,750.
“Real costs outpace inflation,” per Dr. Hargreaves in Oxford University press.
In 2021, contractor mandates followed protests. 2017 saw partial rises after GMB action. Patterns suggest escalation yields change. Unison offers hardship funds; food banks report 30% council worker uptake. Citizens Advice Oxford logs 500 queries post-announcement.
Could strikes really happen in Oxford?
Unite ballots close February 28; 80% turnout could trigger action by April, disrupting waste and care.
DLUHC funding fell 12% real terms since 2024; no mandates for local living wages. Shadow Levelling Up Secretary calls it “Labour failure.”
Potential indirect discrimination suits; past cases like IWGB v London Met cost £millions. Lib Dems vow full adoption if elected 2027; Greens demand emergency levy.
How does this impact council reputation?
Visitor surveys may dip; ethical tourism campaigns cite it negatively.
Chair Dr. Hargreaves: “Disappointing; recommit to aspiration.”
Annual report due April.
Voluntary donations from university, businesses; independent. Some, like Oxford Brookes University, pay it; pressure mounts on council. Unions eye autumn budget for leverage. Over 400; Oxford’s refusal isolates it.
